The emergency work of 'armoring' is to start tomorrow and will cost $2.6 million. It will run across 900 ft of beach from Sloat Boulevard, and opposite the San Francisco zoo.
The decision, in favour of the Department of Public Works, ends a campaign by environmentalists and surfers who had hoped to persuade the Board to vote instead for a much more expensive sand barrier.
Although the sand barrier would mean that erosion would slowly continue, it would preserve the beach for surfing, swimming and recreational use, argued the Save the Waves Coalition and the San Francisco Chapter of Surfrider Foundation.
They also said that the use of rocks will accelerate erosion on either side of the barrier.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93978/939781e351113eddcd25c81ab3d5e04ea2494d54" alt=""
The San Francisco Zoo also borders the road - pic below
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1127/c1127c3491d035eb7981a567a97b39d54d931632" alt=""
Al surfs there a couple of times a week but admitted to not following the debate too closely.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/912de/912de3a566c898dcde1c8ec9ee80c08b4d004720" alt=""
But he was happy to pitch his vote in with the surfers.
'If they're against the rocks, then I'm against the rocks! If it does affect the surf, then I'll be outraged! This is a really nice spot,' he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment